Imagine this offer.

You've spent ten years getting good at your job. A company wants to pay you to teach AI how you do it. You can work remotely, around your existing commitments.

You already have the skills. The extra money would help.

Then you reach the part about what you're helping build: AI that gets better at work people in your profession do.

Would you take it?

On October 4, CBS followed a winemaker, music producer and physician training AI through Mercor alongside their main jobs. 60 Minutes

I understand the appeal. I also understand why someone might pause before saying yes.

I am Alex. Welcome to ShortCu8 by Innov8.

Lets Dive Deep.

Treat AI training as a work offer. Look at the income, the knowledge you're contributing and the terms around it.

You don't have to predict the future of your entire profession before deciding. You should understand the deal in front of you.

Mercor describes consulting projects where experts review AI-generated business plans, financial models and presentations. They spot weak assumptions and explain why a recommendation would fail under scrutiny. Mercor

Think of a simple example.

An AI drafts an email offering a customer delivery by Friday. The email reads well. An experienced salesperson notices that the promise depends on stock the company hasn't confirmed.

Their correction might be: check availability before promising a date.

That's an illustrative scenario, but it shows what experience adds. Someone new to the work might only fix the wording. Someone who's dealt with the consequences knows which promise to question.

The useful contribution is the explanation behind the correction. It gives the system something more specific to learn from than a thumbs-down.

It's easy to say, “Don't help AI learn your profession.”

It's harder to say that to someone who needs the income and has expertise a company is willing to pay for. Why should they turn it down? Someone else may take the assignment anyway.

I wouldn't blame the person accepting it.

But I'd be careful with the comforting answer that humans will always be needed to teach AI. Even if that remains true, it doesn't tell you how many teachers will be needed, how often they'll get work or what they'll earn.

And teaching a system to do parts of a job doesn't establish that it can replace the whole person. Imagine that same salesperson handling an angry customer, negotiating an exception and taking responsibility when delivery fails. Reviewing an email tests only a small part of that work.

Both questions matter: what can the system learn, and what happens to the people whose work helped it improve?

If you're considering this work, I'd check three things.

What can you contribute? Your experience doesn't automatically make a client's documents or your employer's material yours to share. Mercor's consulting listing explicitly excludes confidential or proprietary employer, client and institutional information. Role terms

What happens to your contribution? Ask how your examples and feedback may be used, what rights you're granting and whether the arrangement includes anything beyond payment for the assignment. Those are questions to check in the actual contract.

How dependable is the income? Mercor says consulting engagements may be shortened or ended early. A good hourly rate is worth less to your monthly budget if the hours aren't available. Mercor's FAQ

I'd want clear answers before treating it as dependable income.

One Mercor consulting assignment advertised $95 an hour for creating and grading professional work. That listing is now closed to applications. It demonstrates the offer; it isn't a promise that readers can get that rate today. Listing

The work itself is concrete: experts produce examples, evaluate answers and explain errors. Whether that leads to better tools, fewer jobs or some combination will depend on what systems can do and how employers use them.

A training assignment alone cannot settle that question.

We read every reply - just reply to this email and let us know how we can improve !

#AD1

If you have paid time left on an individual Granola plan, we'll match it with a Wispr Flow subscription that includes Notetaker and dictation, and add bonus time, up to 12 months total. Sign in or create a Wispr account and submit proof of your plan to check eligibility.

Try Notetaker Free

#AD2

Attio is the agentic CRM for modern teams. It’s your always-on revenue engine: agents and workflows build pipeline, chase every buying signal, and move deals forward alongside your team. Try Attio now.